../Images/banner.jpg ../Images/banner1.jpg Images/banner2.jpg Images/banner3.jpg
Identify Pedestrian Facility Need Previous  Index  Next Images/MAGHome.jpg
BACKGROUND

The Maricopa Association of Governments Pedestrian Plan 2000 includes two tools to help assess where pedestrian facility improvements are most needed in the MAG Region and specific recommendations that would create a greater sense of pedestrian comfort. These tools were expressed as roadway design performance guidelines and quantified through the following models:
  • Pedestrian Latent Demand Model
  • Roadside Pedestrian Conditions Model
The models provide statistical support to what can sometimes seem intuitive. In instances where statistical support is helpful or required to justify spending on pedestrian improvements, the models can be deemed critical. However, the logarithmic models can be considered complex and are best understood by engineers that routinely perform this type of work. Other projects may be justified by using a more intuitive approach to determine priorities and degrees of pedestrian accommodations. Still others may require no justification; decision makers need only be directed to guidelines that fit their particular location and condition.

DECISION MAKING SCENARIOS

This section provides three decision making scenarios when determining pedestrian facility need.
  1. When to use the models as presented in the Pedestrian Plan 2000
  2. When to use an intuitive approach
  3. When to simply make a determination of your condition, and then design accordingly
One methodology is provided for assessing project priority for Scenarios #1 and #2.

Scenario   1) When statistical verification is required to support a pedestrian improvement priority and/or a level of pedestrian accommodation: Apply the Pedestrian Latent Demand Model and the Roadside Pedestrian Conditions Model and apply the corresponding level of pedestrian accommodation corresponding to: Safety, Comfort or Destination as defined in this document.
../Images/BottomNav.jpg